{"id":271,"date":"2016-03-14T15:03:31","date_gmt":"2016-03-14T15:03:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web-staging.ncecservices.com\/?p=271"},"modified":"2017-10-05T17:26:27","modified_gmt":"2017-10-05T21:26:27","slug":"20160314-open-vs-closed-primaries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/web-staging.ncecservices.com\/analysis\/20160314-open-vs-closed-primaries\/","title":{"rendered":"Open vs. Closed Primaries a Big Influence Going Forward"},"content":{"rendered":"
National polls continue to show Hillary Clinton with an advantage in the Democratic presidential primary. Recent national polls give her a roughly 10-point lead and most state polls show her having some advantage. As we move into Tuesday’s contests, the open versus closed nature of each primary could clarify the task her campaign faces as it looks to pivot toward the general election.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In Michigan, where Sanders defied the polling, he carried independents who voted in the open contest by a wide margin (71 percent to 28 percent), while Hillary Clinton outperformed Sanders among registered Democrats (58 percent to 40 percent). Those differentials produced a photo finish.<\/p>\n
Public Policy Polling’s latest poll (March 14<\/a>) reflects this split in the next tranche of states, as Sanders leads by significant margins among independents: Illinois (69 percent to 18 percent), Missouri (62 percent to 23 percent), Ohio (53 percent to 20 percent).<\/p>\n With March 15 upon us, here is how the contests stack up:<\/p>\n