{"id":1061,"date":"2018-07-19T17:05:10","date_gmt":"2018-07-19T21:05:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web-staging.ncecservices.com\/?p=1061"},"modified":"2018-07-20T15:38:28","modified_gmt":"2018-07-20T19:38:28","slug":"7-pickup-opportunities-for-democrats-in-california","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/web-staging.ncecservices.com\/analysis\/7-pickup-opportunities-for-democrats-in-california\/","title":{"rendered":"7 Pickup Opportunities for Democrats in California"},"content":{"rendered":"
A Democratic wave in 2018 will depend on results from California, which boasts seven competitive congressional contests. In 2016, Democrats failed to gain any seats here despite Hillary Clinton\u2019s more than 30-point victory margin. There are several districts that make for promising Democratic opportunities this cycle, especially given a couple Republican retirements. However, the turnout–especially in districts with a sizable non-white population–presents a big question.<\/span><\/p>\n To capitalize on a positive political environment, Democrats will need to limit losses among incumbents. It is crucial for them to avoid the difficulties they faced in 2014, when five Democratic incumbents nearly lost their seats as a result of anemic turnout. The difference in turnout between presidential and midterm elections in these districts has a dramatic impact on the incumbents\u2019 chances. In 2016, total turnout increased almost 28 percentage points across the five districts (over 2014). The increased turnout boosted support for the Democrats by approximately 10 points, even though they held a consistent registration advantage over the same period.<\/span><\/p>\n This group of Democratic incumbents will need turnout to remain closer to the 2016 level to ensure a safer path to reelection this year; none of them earned more than 52 percent of the vote in 2014. Nevertheless, our current analysis suggests that these incumbents are likely to be reelected, with the 7th and 16th district facing the most challenging campaigns.<\/span><\/p>\nDemocratic Seats to Watch<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n <\/th>\n 2014<\/th>\n 2016<\/th>\n 2018<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n \n District<\/th>\n Dem. Incumbent<\/th>\n Dem. Reg
Advantage<\/th>\nDem. Victory
Margin<\/th>\nDem. Reg.
Advantage<\/th>\nDem. Victory
Margin<\/th>\nDem. Reg.
Advantage<\/th>\nDem. Victory
Margin<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n\n CA-07<\/td>\n Ami Bera<\/td>\n 2.3<\/td>\n 0.8<\/td>\n 5.5<\/td>\n 2.3<\/td>\n 6.3<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n CA-16<\/td>\n Jim Costa<\/td>\n 16.5<\/td>\n 1.5<\/td>\n 18.8<\/td>\n 16.1<\/td>\n 18.8<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n CA-26<\/td>\n Julia Brownley<\/td>\n 8.1<\/td>\n 2.7<\/td>\n 12.3<\/td>\n 20.8<\/td>\n 13.1<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n CA-31<\/td>\n Pete Aguilar<\/td>\n 6.1<\/td>\n 3.5<\/td>\n 12.1<\/td>\n 12.1<\/td>\n 12.6<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n CA-52<\/td>\n Gary Peters<\/td>\n -1.3<\/td>\n 3.2<\/td>\n 3.3<\/td>\n 13.1<\/td>\n 4.5<\/td>\n –<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Democratic Targets<\/span><\/h3>\n